It's about 7.5 years since debut of very compact and practical Mitakon 35mm F0.95 Mark II lens, which slowly but step by step became well recognized as a great manual focusing ultra-fast prime lens for APS-C loved by many experienced photographers. I'm also a big fan of that Speedmaster lens and used to shoot with it for years on Fuji X sensors primarily. Since then few other lens manufacturers designed more 35mm F0.95 alternatives with either more advanced optics or with more compact size but still decent optical performance. One of my favorite from that list is TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 lens in Fuji X mount thanks to its extremely small size and excellently crafted mechanics including smooth focusing and aperture click stops.
Cosina recently added one more lens to the market of APS-C 35mm ultra-fast optics - Voigtlander 35mm F0.9 Nokton Aspherical in Fuji X mount, which I briefly reviewed in previous article. Today I'm comparing it's performance with TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 to better understand strong and weak aspects of each lens.
Comparing to TTArtisan 35mm F0.95
TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 lens is few times smaller and lighter and more important costs about 10x times less which may be number one decision point for many. I like a lot how TTArtisan 35mm F0.95 pairs with smaller Fujifilm X-E2s camera - much better overall experience comparing to Mitakon 35mm F0.95 Mark II. It looks even better size wise next to large Voigtlander 35mm F0.9. From the other side F0.9 lens has much more advanced optical formula and manufacturing quality of reputable Voigtlander brand in addition to modern complex FLE focusing.
I've took both lenses for a short photo walk and took sequence of pictures to check how practical performance shows up.
Image samples
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
- B, A
- A, B
- B, A
- A, B
- B, A
Physical aperture size
- TTArtisan - 32mm at infinity focus (focal length is closer to 34mm)
- TTArtisan - 32mm at MDF (focal length is closer to 38mm, increased by 4mm focusing distance)
- Voigtlander - 38.5mm at infinity focus
- Voigtlander - 39mm at MFD (thanks to FLE design, or perhaps the measurement error)
- TTArtisan - F1.06
- TTArtisan - F1.19
- Voigtlander - F0.90 at infinity (great job Cosina engineers!)
- Voigtlander - somewhere in range of F1.0 - F1.1 (hard to calculate due to FLE increasing focal length in 4-8mm range)
I'll need to spend more time shooting with both lenses to continue writing this article and add more conclusions, so more info to be added soon. . .
Very nice review. I own the TTArtisan as well as Mitakon 35/0.95. Considering the extra size, weight, and cost of the Voigtlander do you think it's worth it for the improved optical performance?
ReplyDeleteI think it's pure subjective decision, because both Mitakon and Voigtlander are delivering decent IQ and very enjoyable rendering. Mitakon obviously has strong advantage of being much more compact and five times more affordable, and it's already very well known lens. I'd definitely wait for Voigtlander prices move down a bit before considering it as improved IQ alternative if you already have Mitakon.
DeleteThanks yuko for the comparison. two lenses are very interesting to their different characteristics. I read the article from my smartphone and for fun I quickly chose 5 compare pictures. I discovered that I chose those from to the Voightlander lens. I don't think it's a strange coincidence.
ReplyDeleteIf you check the pictures carefully in full res it's a no brainer, the Voigtlander is vastly superior to the TT Artisan, better sharpness, better color rendition and contrast, nicer bokeh. Of course the price difference is steep so lots of people will still prefer the TT Artisan
ReplyDelete